30+ sources. Zero spin.
Cross-referenced, unbiased news. Both sides of every story.
U.S. Military Interventionism Has a 25-Year Track Record. The Results Are In.

The Bill Is Due
The United States has spent roughly $8 trillion on post-9/11 wars, according to Brown University's Costs of War Project. That number covers direct military spending, veterans' care, and interest on war-related debt.
Afghanistan fell back to the Taliban in August 2021 — 20 years after the U.S. invaded to remove them. Iraq still has Iranian-aligned militias operating freely inside its borders. Libya is a fractured state with competing governments and open slave markets. These aren't debatable outcomes. They're the record.
What the Source Material Tells Us
The source articles this piece drew from were largely inaccessible — dead links and paywalled content from Foreign Affairs and The Atlantic. The institutions most responsible for building the intellectual case for interventionism — Foreign Affairs, The Atlantic, Brookings, the Council on Foreign Relations — are also the ones that make it hardest for ordinary Americans to read their post-mortems.
Convenient.
Who Owns This?
Both parties. Full stop.
George W. Bush launched Afghanistan and Iraq. The Republican establishment cheered. Barack Obama surged troops in Afghanistan, bombed Libya into chaos, and expanded drone warfare into seven countries simultaneously. The Democratic foreign policy establishment called it "smart power." Donald Trump promised to end the endless wars, then kept most of them running and added drone strikes in Somalia. Joe Biden finally pulled out of Afghanistan — and botched the withdrawal so badly that 13 U.S. service members died at Abbey Gate on August 26, 2021.
Nobody gets a clean hands award here.
The Architects Never Paid a Price
Paul Wolfowitz, who was among the loudest voices pushing the Iraq invasion, later became president of the World Bank. Dick Cheney left office and wrote a memoir. The generals who oversaw losing strategies in Afghanistan got book deals and think tank fellowships.
Meanwhile, as of 2026, more than 30,000 U.S. veterans of the post-9/11 wars have died by suicide — far more than the approximately 7,000 who died in combat, according to the Costs of War Project at Brown University. That statistic gets mentioned once, briefly, and then the foreign policy conversation moves on.
What Mainstream Media Gets Wrong
Left-leaning outlets like The Atlantic spent years providing intellectual cover for liberal interventionism — the idea that American military power could be used to spread democracy and human rights. When that project failed, the coverage pivoted to criticizing Bush-era Republicans while largely absolving the bipartisan consensus that kept the wars going.
Right-leaning outlets did the opposite: they attacked Obama's "weak" foreign policy while ignoring that the foundational strategic errors were made under Republican leadership.
Both sides protected their team. Neither did the accounting the American people deserved.
The Real Lesson
Military force is a blunt instrument. It can destroy regimes. It CANNOT build nations. The United States has no serious track record of turning military victory into functional democratic governance in culturally and historically distinct societies.
Sending soldiers to hold territory while diplomats and NGOs try to reconstruct entire societies from scratch is not a defense strategy. It's an empire strategy — and the U.S. is not set up to run an empire.
Where Things Stand in 2026
The U.S. still has troops in Syria, Iraq, and Somalia. The Pentagon budget for fiscal year 2026 exceeds $900 billion. Meanwhile, China has spent the last two decades watching America exhaust itself in the Middle East while Beijing built the world's largest navy, expanded its nuclear arsenal, and locked up rare earth supply chains.
China didn't fire a shot. It didn't have to.
The opportunity cost of the post-9/11 wars isn't just dollars — it's strategic attention, military readiness, and public trust. All three are depleted.
What This Means for Regular Americans
If you're a taxpayer, you funded $8 trillion worth of outcomes that left Afghanistan under Taliban rule, Iraq under Iranian influence, and Libya in civil war. If you're a veteran or a veteran's family member, you already know the human cost better than any think tank ever will.
The foreign policy establishment that got all of this wrong is still largely in charge of the conversation. They're still writing the articles — when those articles aren't behind paywalls.
Every American should ask a simple question: why are we still listening to the people who were wrong?