30+ sources. Zero spin.
Cross-referenced, unbiased news. Both sides of every story.
The CFTC Lost 175 Employees and Gained Two New Industries It Can't Afford to Regulate

The Numbers Don't Lie
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission had 726 employees at the end of fiscal year 2024. By the end of March 2025, that number had fallen to 551 — a loss of 175 people, or roughly 24% of the workforce, according to Office of Personnel Management data cited by Bloomberg Law.
These weren't entry-level paper pushers. Former Democratic CFTC Commissioner Kristin Johnson, now a law professor at George Washington University, told Bloomberg Law these departures included "seasoned, senior, veteran lawyers and economists in key areas of the commission's divisions responsible for licensing, supervision, oversight, and enforcement."
In plain English: the people who actually knew what they were doing are gone.
Now Hand Them Two Entire New Industries
Congress is moving forward with the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633), digital asset market structure legislation that cleared a key Senate Banking Committee hurdle recently. The bill would make the CFTC the primary U.S. crypto regulator.
At the same time, CFTC Chairman Michael Selig — currently the agency's only sitting commissioner, with four seats vacant — is aggressively asserting the CFTC's jurisdiction over prediction markets. The agency has filed lawsuits against states and their gambling regulators to claim that turf.
The timing is stark: workforce gutted, then mandate doubled.
What Are Prediction Markets, Exactly?
Prediction markets let people trade contracts based on future real-world outcomes — election results, Fed rate decisions, sports scores, you name it. Most contracts are binary: you win if the event happens, you lose if it doesn't.
According to Chainalysis, activity in crypto-based prediction markets has been trending sharply upward since September 2024, with the 2024 U.S. presidential election acting as a major catalyst. Institutional players — including professional trading firms — are now entering the space alongside retail bettors, signaling this isn't a niche hobby anymore.
CME Group and Coinbase are both building infrastructure to capture this volume. This is real money moving through real markets.
The Conflict-of-Interest Problem
The New York Times has highlighted a troubling alignment: the Trump family has heavy financial investments in both crypto and prediction markets, while the CFTC under Trump appointees has simultaneously dialed back enforcement and pushed to expand into industries where the president's family profits.
The timing raises questions. The regulatory pullback, the appointment of a sole commissioner with no checks from other seats, and the aggressive jurisdictional land-grab over prediction markets all coincided with Trump-linked crypto ventures expanding.
But the full picture is more complex. The CFTC's capacity problem predates Trump. As Bloomberg Law notes, the agency's jurisdiction "completely exploded" in 2010 under Dodd-Frank when swaps were added to its portfolio, and budget never kept pace. This isn't purely a Trump-era story. It's a decades-long pattern of Congress expanding agency mandates without funding them. Trump's workforce cuts made it worse. The structural rot was already there.
One Commissioner. Four Empty Seats.
The agency that is about to become the top cop for a multi-trillion dollar crypto market and a fast-growing prediction market industry has one commissioner making decisions right now.
Michael Selig was appointed by Trump and is running the whole show solo. There is no dissent, no internal debate, no checks from other commissioners. The administration hasn't filled the other four seats.
This is either breathtaking negligence or deliberate design. Either way, it's a precarious structure for regulating a market that could affect millions of Americans.
What the Experts Are Actually Saying
Bill Walsh, a partner at Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff who previously served as senior enforcement counsel at CME Group, told Bloomberg Law: "The people that they lost in the last year and a half, both as a matter of headcount and expertise, puts them in kind of a tough spot."
That's a former industry insider — not a progressive think tank — raising concerns about the watchdog's capacity.
The Trump administration is requesting more money and larger headcount for the CFTC. But you can't undo the loss of experienced institutional knowledge just by hiring new staff. The expertise gap takes years to close.
What This Means for You
If you're trading crypto or placing bets on prediction platforms, the agency nominally overseeing those markets is understaffed, under-resourced, and running on a skeleton crew while its rulebook is still being written.
When something goes wrong — and in immature markets with massive retail participation, something always eventually does — the regulator supposed to catch it may not have the people to catch it.
Chainalysis notes that blockchain's public ledger does provide real transparency advantages for detecting fraud and manipulation. But transparency without enforcement is just a paper trail after the fact.
The CFTC is being handed an impossible job with a shrinking team. That's a governance failure regardless of who's running it.