30+ sources. Zero spin.
Cross-referenced, unbiased news. Both sides of every story.
Shipping Costs Up Over 100% on Key Routes Since U.S.-Iran War Began in Late February

The Numbers Are Ugly
The spot freight rate for a 40-foot container on the Shanghai-to-New York route has risen 98% since February 28, reaching $5,505, according to maritime research firm Drewry. The Shanghai-to-Los Angeles rate jumped 108% over the same period, hitting $4,565.
Those are not rounding errors. Those are prices that get passed to consumers.
Drewry's benchmark World Container Index — tracking a standard 40-foot container across global routes — hit $3,344 as of June 4, up from $1,899 on February 26. That's a 76% increase in roughly 100 days, as reported by Anadolu News Agency.
For context, rates are now approaching the peak of last year, when the index reached $3,543 on June 12, 2025.
What's Actually Driving This
Multiple factors are converging simultaneously.
First: The Strait of Hormuz. Trade flows through the strait are running 90% below normal levels, according to the Tehran Times citing Anadolu. That single chokepoint handles roughly 20% of globally traded oil. When it's effectively closed, the ripple effects go everywhere.
Second: Southeast Asia port congestion. The transpacific shipping route — the one that carries goods from China to the U.S. — doesn't actually go through the Strait of Hormuz. Yet those rates are up over 100%.
The connection is indirect. Peter Sand, chief analyst at freight analytics firm Xeneta, explained it plainly: carriers are rerouting ships and redesigning service networks in response to the Hormuz closure, which is creating massive congestion at transshipment hubs like Singapore and Port Klang in Malaysia. Those hubs process cargo headed everywhere — including across the Pacific.
"Port disruption is toxic for supply chains, especially at transshipment hubs with global significance," Sand told gCaptain on June 5.
Lars Jensen, president of shipping consultancy Vespucci Maritime, told ICIS: "It is not the blockage of the Strait of Hormuz itself which is causing this tightness." The Hormuz crisis is the reason the knock-on disruptions aren't resolving.
Third: Tariff frontloading. Section 301 tariffs are scheduled to take effect in July. U.S. importers are rushing to place orders on ships now to beat the deadline. Drewry told ICIS this week that "demand is being supported by shippers bringing forward bookings ahead of potential US tariff changes expected in July."
Carriers know this. They're capitalizing on it. "Carriers successfully implemented peak season surcharges on the transpacific eastbound trade route starting this month," Drewry said.
Fourth: Energy cost fears. Sand warned that if energy costs spike in the second half of 2026 due to oil price increases from the Hormuz disruption, importers may try to frontload again — which would push rates even higher. "If shippers do look to frontload imports, then carriers will look to push rates higher and higher," he said. "The market may yet be far from its peak."
The 2026 FIFA World Cup is also driving elevated cargo demand.
The Last 30 Days Got Worse Fast
The acceleration within recent weeks is striking. According to ICIS reporting from June 5, rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles surged 31% in a single week. Shanghai to New York was up 20% in the same period. Xeneta's data shows the Far East-to-U.S. West Coast rate climbed 20% over the past week alone, reaching $3,933 per FEU (forty-foot equivalent unit).
Far East-to-U.S. East Coast rates hit $5,103 per FEU, up 92% since late February, according to Xeneta.
Drewry expects "further upward pressure on rates in the coming weeks."
What Mainstream Coverage Is Getting Wrong
Most media coverage is framing this as a simple Middle East story — oil tankers, Hormuz, war. That's incomplete.
The bigger story is that a regional military conflict is rewiring global supply chain logistics in real time. Ships are rerouting. Port schedules are blowing up. Carrier networks are being redesigned on the fly. The cascade effects are landing on trade routes that have zero geographic connection to the Middle East.
The tariff-frontloading dynamic is also amplifying the crisis. The U.S. government's own trade policy is accelerating a supply chain crisis caused by military action. Whether you support the tariffs or not, the timing is objectively terrible for anyone who buys imported goods.
The Tehran Times piece leans into anti-U.S. framing — calling it a "war on Iran" — but the underlying data it cites from Anadolu and Drewry checks out. Strip the editorial spin and the numbers are real.
What This Means
Shipping costs are one of the most reliable leading indicators of consumer price inflation. When it costs twice as much to move a container from Shanghai to Los Angeles, that cost gets added to the price of electronics, furniture, clothing, and appliances.
Americans are already watching their grocery bills. Freight markets are signaling that there's more coming.
The war started February 28. It's now been nearly 100 days. No resolution is visible. Rates are still climbing. Drewry and Xeneta — two of the most reliable data sources in global shipping — both say the peak may not be here yet.