AI-POWERED NEWS

30+ sources. Zero spin.

Cross-referenced, unbiased news. Both sides of every story.

← Back to headlines

Inflation Nowcast Hits 4.18% as Fed Leadership Void Opens and Markets Eye Two More Rate Hikes

Inflation Nowcast Hits 4.18% as Fed Leadership Void Opens and Markets Eye Two More Rate Hikes
New data from the Cleveland Fed shows year-over-year CPI nowcasting at 4.18% as of May 29 — double the Fed's 2% target — while Jerome Powell exits the chairmanship under DOJ investigation and markets begin pricing in the possibility of rate hikes, not cuts. The story has moved well past the April 29 hold decision. The real news is what's coming next.

The Inflation Number Nobody Is Talking About

Forget the April 29 rate hold. That's old news.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland's Inflation Nowcasting model — updated May 29, 2026 — is projecting year-over-year CPI at 4.18% for May. Core CPI at 2.82%. PCE at 3.99%. Core PCE at 3.33%.

The Fed's target is 2%. The nowcast is sitting at more than double that for headline CPI. On a quarterly annualized basis, the Cleveland Fed model is projecting CPI at 6.54% for Q2 2026.

Mainstream financial media spent the week after the April FOMC meeting debating the tone of the statement. The actual inflation trajectory tells a different story.

Markets Are Starting to Price In Hikes — Not Cuts

Bloomberg's coverage flagged commentary from Tannuzzo suggesting markets could price in two Fed rate hikes — a dramatic reversal from the rate-cut narrative that dominated headlines for the past year.

Bloomberg also highlighted analysis from Priya Misra focused on real consumption data as a key variable the Fed is watching. If consumers are pulling back, that could offset inflationary pressure. But with energy prices still elevated following Middle East conflict, the math isn't clean.

Most financial outlets are telling a different story: "Fed holds, cuts coming soon." The data suggests otherwise.

Powell Is Out — Under DOJ Investigation

Jerome Powell's final press conference as Fed chairman happened at the April 29 meeting. According to U.S. Bank's coverage of the event, Powell confirmed he will remain on the Board of Governors — but only until a DOJ investigation into him is, in his words, "well and truly over."

The investigation concerns congressional testimony Powell gave regarding cost overruns on the Fed's headquarters renovations. Not monetary policy. Construction bills.

President Trump cannot nominate a replacement for Powell's Board seat until Powell actually steps down. That creates a leadership gap at the exact moment the Fed faces its most complex inflation environment in years.

Warsh Confirmation Advances — But Timing Is Everything

Kevin Warsh is on track to replace Powell as chairman. According to U.S. Bank, the Senate Banking Committee advanced Warsh's nomination to the Senate floor on April 29 — the same day as the FOMC meeting.

Warsh is a former Fed governor with a reputation for hawkish leanings. If inflation keeps running hot — and the Cleveland Fed nowcast suggests it is — Warsh stepping into the chair role could signal a harder line on rates than markets are currently pricing.

The transition period itself is the risk. Two leadership structures in flux simultaneously: the chairmanship and Powell's Board seat. Markets hate uncertainty. The Fed just handed them a double dose.

What the FOMC Minutes Actually Said

The March 17-18 FOMC minutes — published on federalreserve.gov — give critical context for understanding why the April hold was not the dovish signal some outlets portrayed it as.

According to those minutes, front-month crude oil futures rose roughly 50% during the inter-meeting period following the outbreak of Middle East conflict. The one-year inflation swap rate rose nearly 50 basis points over the same period.

FOMC members noted that longer-dated oil futures didn't move as sharply — suggesting markets expected the spike to be temporary. But temporary energy inflation has a way of becoming embedded in core prices if it persists long enough.

The Internal Fed Divide Is Bigger Than Reported

The April 29 decision looked unified on the surface, but it wasn't.

According to U.S. Bank's reporting on the meeting, nearly all voting members backed holding rates. But one member favored a 0.25% rate cut outright. Three others dissented — not on the rate decision itself, but on the statement's easing bias, arguing the Fed was signaling future cuts too strongly.

Previous coverage addressed Bowman's position on the dissents. The internal split is now framed against a backdrop of worsening inflation nowcasts. The three members who pushed back on the easing language appear increasingly correct.

What This Means for Regular People

If the Cleveland Fed's nowcast holds — and models that use daily oil and gasoline prices tend to be directionally reliable — the next official inflation print will be difficult.

Higher inflation means the Fed cuts later, not sooner. It means mortgage rates stay elevated. Car loans stay expensive. Credit card rates stay punishing.

U.S. Bank's Rob Haworth, senior investment strategy director, put it plainly: "Policymakers still need more evidence that inflation can keep moving lower before they gain confidence in a clearer rate-cut path."

That evidence is not arriving. It's going the wrong direction.

Sources

center-left Bloomberg Market Could Price in Two Fed Hikes: Tannuzzo
center-left Bloomberg Watching Real Consumption: Priya Misra
center-left Bloomberg Yield is the 'Name of the Game': Toublan
unknown usbank Federal Reserve Monetary Policy | U.S. Bank
unknown clevelandfed Inflation Nowcasting
unknown federalreserve.gov The Fed - Monetary Policy: