30+ sources. Zero spin.
Cross-referenced, unbiased news. Both sides of every story.
DOJ Files to Strip Citizenship From 17 Naturalized Americans Who Concealed Serious Crimes

The Cases Are Real. The Crimes Are Serious.
On Monday, June 8, 2026, the Department of Justice announced complaints filed in federal courts across the country targeting 17 naturalized U.S. citizens for denaturalization.
These are NOT people being targeted for their politics, their ethnicity, or their religion. According to the Justice Department, every single one of them concealed criminal history — or committed crimes — while obtaining U.S. citizenship.
The list, as detailed by the DOJ and reported by CBS News and Newsweek, includes:
- Fernando Cristancho, a Colombian-born Catholic priest who sexually groomed a minor parishioner from age 11 to 13, pleaded guilty to coercion and enticement of a minor, and hid his crimes from immigration officials throughout the naturalization process.
- Abdikadir Ali Kadiye, a 54-year-old Somali national who used TWO separate identities — including fabricated family details — to gain entry and later citizenship. He admitted to using both identities after naturalization.
- Ronnie Price, from Trinidad and Tobago, who lied during naturalization about a statutory rape conviction involving a 16-year-old girl.
- Leidys Delmas Garcia, a Cuban national convicted in a multimillion-dollar health care fraud scheme involving fraudulent physical therapy claims.
- Talman Harris, a Jamaican national convicted in a stock manipulation and wire fraud operation that caused tens of millions in investor losses.
- A Haitian immigrant who allegedly sexually abused his own daughter.
- A former Yugoslav national convicted of sexually abusing a child under age 15.
- An Indian immigrant, Neeraj Sharma, convicted of visa fraud involving fraudulent H-1B petitions.
The countries of origin span Somalia, China, Colombia, India, Haiti, Cuba, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, the Philippines, Mexico, and the former Yugoslavia, according to the Daily Signal.
What the Law Actually Says
This isn't some novel Trump-era legal theory. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 has always allowed citizenship revocation when naturalization was obtained through fraud, concealment of material facts, or willful misrepresentation.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche was blunt: "When criminal aliens exploit the naturalization process by breaking the law, there are consequences."
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem put it plainly: "American citizenship is a privilege, and it must be earned honestly. If you come here and break our laws, and lie in your immigration proceedings, you forfeit that privilege."
Historic Scale — With Bigger Numbers Coming
Between 1990 and 2017, the DOJ filed an average of 11 denaturalization complaints per year, according to CBS News. Last month, the administration announced a dozen cases — at the time the largest single action in years. This week's batch of 17 tops that.
But according to Legis1, citing a Congressional Research Service report published last week, the administration's internal guidance is targeting 100 to 200 denaturalization referrals per month for the rest of fiscal year 2026. Sustained at that pace, that amounts to roughly a 4,000 percent increase over historical norms.
What the Civil Process Actually Means
The CRS report flagged by Legis1 lays out something the mainstream coverage is largely glossing over: the government is using civil proceedings almost exclusively, and there's a reason for that.
Under civil denaturalization (8 U.S.C. § 1451), there is NO statute of limitations, no right to a court-appointed attorney, and the evidentiary standard — while high — is lower than criminal court. Criminal proceedings offer far more defendant protections, including proof beyond a reasonable doubt and a 10-year statute of limitations.
For the 17 cases announced Monday, where the alleged fraud and crimes are serious and documented, this distinction carries less weight. But at 100-200 cases per month, the legal framework question becomes a legitimate one.
What the Media Is Getting Wrong
Left-leaning outlets are framing this as a sweeping threat to immigrant communities. That framing is dishonest for this batch of cases — these are child predators and fraudsters, NOT political dissidents.
Right-leaning outlets are treating this as a clean win with no caveats. That's also lazy. The 4,000 percent scaling of this program is genuinely unprecedented, and Congress is already grappling with legislation — including the SCAM Act, the Naturalization Accountability Act, and the American Citizens First Act — to either codify or constrain executive denaturalization authority.
Both interpretations miss the complete picture.
What This Means for Regular People
If you obtained U.S. citizenship honestly, you have nothing to fear here.
If you lied on your citizenship application to conceal that you abused children, ran fraud schemes, or distributed drugs — the government has finally noticed.
The principle is sound. The specific cases announced Monday are defensible. At a pace of 200 cases per month, the quality control and legal safeguards become increasingly important questions. Congress will need to determine whether existing authority covers this scale of action, or whether new legislation is necessary.
The 17 people announced Monday who allegedly cheated the system while hurting real victims are now facing the consequences.